Following on from my fake flashlight post concerning the ultrafire mini, I decided to add some more conspiracy to the fake debate by taking a look at my recently acquired Sipik SK-68 and noting any differencs over my supposed real Ultrafire Mini's .
Part 2 - Enter the Sipik
Just a five minute test reveals the differences between these two 'identicle' torches. Looking at them you might think there is very little between them but you would be wrong. pitted againgst the so called original Ultrafire we see this flashlight out perform its cousin by a country mile.
I don't get it? So the original Ultrafire Mini Cree is crap compared to its replica? Either the Sipik SK-68 is an improvement counterfeit or my genuine Ultrafire wasn't all that genuine afterall?!?
It seems that all the positive criticism was worth listening to.
It is a fantastic copy of a fantastic flashlight.
I paid a pound for mine!
Genuine Ultrafire Mini and the Sipik Mini
Points Of Superiority
1. The Sipik is brighter
2. The Sipik has a better button
3. The Sipik has 3 modes
4. The Sipik has better zoom movement
5. The Sipik has a better quality spring
6. The Sipik has better screw threads
7. The Sipik has a better lens
8. The Sipik has a better Anodised finish
The Sipik (left) has far better looking electronics
The extra rubber o-ring on the zoom head adds a further feeling of security when considering the waterproof qualities of these torches.
With the prospect of another 5 of these arriving soon it could be too early to say if this superb Sipik will be a consistent performer and not just a one off. Far too often quality control goes to hell in these factories and many variations in quality make it out the warehouse doors.
